By JUSTIN PRITCHARDAssociated Press
LOS ANGELES (AP) - A New Jersey energy company required by an unusual legal settlement to build an extensive network of electric car chargers throughout California has delivered just 10 percent of what it promised in the first year.
By fortifying the state's still-spotty charging infrastructure, the settlement between NRG Energy Inc. and California energy regulators was sold as the key to jump-starting enthusiasm for the non-polluting vehicles. With more places to "refuel," more people would have confidence that they won't get stranded by a dead battery. And widespread adoption of the cars would help the state meet ambitious air quality goals.
Instead of Californians plugging in, however, progress has been plugged up: Just 110 of the 1,040 stations that NRG committed to installing by early December are ready.
The subsidiary responsible for building the stations over four years, NRG eVgo, blames a series of unanticipated problems, including a reluctance among owners of malls, offices and apartment buildings to provide space for the chargers - even when the company subsidizes their cost.
The count of new stations so far, released to The Associated Press, is likely to renew concern over the settlement and whether NRG eVgo will be able to comply with it. By the end of 2016, the company is to spend $90.5 million to install at least 10,200 new charging stations statewide.
State officials promoted the deal as a creative way to resolve a decade-old legal claim California filed on behalf of electricity customers amid the state's power crisis. NRG co-owned power plants sold the state electricity at inflated prices; the company inherited the entire liability when it took full ownership of the plants.
From the outset, skeptics suggested that the settlement doesn't adequately compensate Californians or penalize the company for the alleged price gouging. For one, NRG keeps profits from the chargers.
"How is that a penalty? You're giving them more locations. And they're earning revenue from them," said John Gartner, research director of smart transportation at Navigant Research who has followed the settlement. "Really, really weird."
While California's many environmentally inclined consumers may seem eager for electric cars - and, led by Gov. Jerry Brown, the state is relying on 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles to reduce air pollution - the lack of charging stations remains a barrier.
In a series of interviews, NRG eVgo's vice president of business development in California both acknowledged difficulties in the rollout and insisted "great progress" was being made.
"I'm absolutely confident this is not only realistic but absolutely transformational" for air quality and electric vehicle adoption in California, NRG eVgo's Terry O'Day said.
So far, little has been transformed, save corners of a few shopping mall and apartment complex parking lots. O'Day said property owners have been surprisingly skeptical. Local planning regulations also can get in the way, he said, despite the enthusiasm from leaders at the state level.
O'Day is a longtime supporter and enthusiastic promoter of electric cars.
Soon after federal regulators approved the settlement last November, he told a former president of the Electric Vehicle Association of Southern California that 15 fast-charging "Freedom Stations" should be in the ground by end of March.
A year later, seven are operational.
Under the settlement, NRG eVgo was supposed to have installed 40 such stations by Dec. 5. Available to the public, for $10 they allow cars to go about 80 miles after 20 minutes of charging. The stations opened so far are at five malls in the San Diego, Los Angeles and San Francisco Bay areas, and at two Whole Foods markets.
The settlement also envisioned that by Dec. 5, there would be 1,000 "Level 2" chargers that supply enough electricity for 12 to 24 road miles for each hour of charging. So far, 103 are operational, including 40 at a high-end apartment complex in San Diego.
Those chargers are available to NRG eVgo subscribers who park at apartment complexes or office buildings where the charging stations have been installed. To stimulate demand, the company reduced monthly rates from $79 to about $35, plus electricity.
The slow start does not seem to concern California energy regulators.
The settlement contains language that allows annual targets to be missed as long as the company is making "reasonable efforts." Staff at the California Public Utilities Commission, which approved the deal last year, said they believe NRG eVgo is complying.
"You need to build in some elasticity in the timeframe because you don't know what's going to happen in an emerging market," said CPUC attorney Chris Clay. "We're optimistic that these guys will pull it off."
O'Day said his company has submitted permit requests or started to construct 31 more fast-charging stations and expects to pick up the pace - and expand into the San Joaquin Valley - in 2014. The timetable is back loaded: just 40 of the 200 promised "fast chargers" and 1,000 of the 10,000 promised Level 2 chargers were scheduled for the first year, with the numbers increasing annually as year four approaches.
For Paul Scott, who sells the Nissan Leaf in Los Angeles, the chargers can't come fast enough.
Returning late one night recently from San Diego, he ran into trouble when one fast charger was dark and a freeway closure sent him miles off his normal route. His battery ran low and at 3 a.m. he found himself waiting an hour and a half to get enough juice from a Level 2 charger to get home. A fast charger would have had him on the road in 10 minutes.
"I gotta say, we need those chargers in the ground as fast as possible," Scott said. "I'm disappointed things haven't happened quicker."
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.